This political sequence ends with the use of 49.3. are you surprised How do we explain that the government chose to ignore the proposals of the social partners and mobilize a large part of the world of work?
Miriam Revue Dalon I am not really surprised and not only for pragmatic reasons: we have known for some time that, despite negotiations and special agreements with the Republic (LR), the government was not guaranteed to obtain the necessary majority. The end of this political hierarchy corresponds to the logic of power which, from the beginning, has been exercised in a vertical and personal way, ignoring the need for real consultation with the opposition, with intermediate authorities (mayors for example) and especially with the social partners. When Laurent Berger talks about a “democratic deputy” About 49.3, does not mean that it is an illegal practice (49.3 procedure provided for in the Constitution of VH Republic) But in this case, the basic reform such as reforming the pension system enters into a social project, a certain vision of work (Is work just a commodity?) and the concept of democracy that cannot be reduced to elections and respect for parliamentary procedures. In a living democracy, elective voting does not exhaust the political capacity of citizens. presence and limitations
This article is for subscribers only. To read more, take advantage of our non-binding offers!
or
Exclusively from Google: 6.99 € / month
By choosing this promotional subscription path, you accept the deposit of an analysis cookie by Google.
